Quantcast
Channel: PCMSpace » IBM WWCM
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Not so good features of IBM’s WWCM 6.0.x

$
0
0

There are lots of information available around features available with IBM’s WWCM.  What I have tried is to highlight are not so good features of WWCM. This list is based on my experience and will be looking  forward to hear from WWCM experts: 

  • Versioning:
    • No control of number of versions to be maintained at content type level. It’s all or none
    • No control over which content type needs versioning and which not. Its either all or none
    • No versioning at component (Image, Menu, Navigator etc.) level  
  • Syndication/ Content Publish:
    • All the syndicators will be either scheduled or none of them. You cannot choose few syndicators to be automated while leaving others as manual process
    • Once the content becomes live/published it is moved across from one to other environment. There is no way to control approval of the content for specific publisher/syndicator as with other products
    • Tough to debug the cause of failure of syndicator
    • If there are some failed items with syndicator, it is tough to determine which content items failed
    • Lack of customization
    • Syndication/Publish history view is not available 
  • WCM Portlets
    • Out of the Box WCM authoring and rendering portlets are legacy IBM portlets and are not JSR standards
    • Customization is painful as it uses IBM specific code and it is not exposed 
  • Customizations are
    • Tough as they are IBM legacy portlets
    • Limited set of API and taglibs available which prevents customization 
  • Rendition Services
    • No rendition service available out of the box 
  • Workflows
    • Basic workflows can be defined
    • Parallel workflows I do not think are possible
    • Workflows available only for Authoring templates but not for components
    • Granular level privileges not possible to implement  Example: Controlling function privileges at each stage
    • No funda of voting and group approvals and rejects 
  • Caching
    • No Database caching
    • If using JSP components for a functionality through Presentation Templates, there is no Out of the Box caching available 
  • Rich Text Editor
    • Out of the Box RTE adds unnecessary HTML tags while creating content. Example: Adding <p> tags
    • Out of the Box RTE doesn’t provide features like copy from word which is quite common these days 
  • Context upload and Extract:
    • No Out of the Box facility to import content  to WWCM. We need to write a custom module to upload
    • No Out of the Box facility to export content in readable format. Example: XML 
  • Reporting:
    • Custom build is needed for any reporting. Example: Content extract between dates to a specified format, Content changes between two dates, content status between two servers etc. 
  • Secured binaries (like images, documents etc. )  are stored in database than file system
  • No basic WebServices available for Content Services

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2

Latest Images

Trending Articles





Latest Images